home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.tcd.net!visionary
- From: mchapin@vcn.com (Mike Chapin)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.delphi,comp.lang.pascal,comp.lang.pascal.borland,comp.lang.pascal.delphi.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.misc,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools.misc,comp.windows.ms.programmer
- Subject: Re: HELP: C++ or DELPHI ? We need translate DOS program which written in BP/TV.
- Date: 11 Apr 1996 10:51:43 GMT
- Organization: Powder River
- Message-ID: <4kio7v$fdn@news.tcd.net>
- References: <DoJ6yG.FIn@actcom.co.il> <315C20CD.7CEE@airmail.net> <828295369snz@display.co.uk> <315FF327.1FF2@airmail.net> <316AEF01.526@trl.oz.au>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: vision29.vcn.com
- X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4
-
- In article <316AEF01.526@trl.oz.au>, Jacques Guy <j.guy@trl.oz.au> wrote:
- >Perhaps the question should not be just a matter of C++ against
- >Delphi. It may be worth considering Oberon/F. I had a cursory
- >look at it two months ago and it seemed an efficient language
- >(Delphi-like but far better thought out, and elegant), well
- >implemented. Its interface is simpler than Delphi (and Visual
- >Basic) and it is much less demanding on resources.
-
- The only version of Oberon I saw made Modula-2 look flexible.
-
- >I could not
- >run Delphi on my old 386DX33 (of course!), but I could Oberon/F
- >without much pain.
-
- I'm running Delphi on a 386-40 with no problems at all.
-
-
-